April 2014 Updates

Updates of Court of Appeals decisions relevant to land use, zoning, and planning are available via the @sammartinolaw twitter account, which you can also access via the widget on the front page of this site. Follow @sammartinolaw for news about community events and public works equally as gripping as this story

Here is a recap:

  • Division One of the Arizona Court of Appeals clarified and moderately extended the circumstances in which a government entity waives its notice-of-claim defense by participating in the litigation of the merits of a claim against it in Ponce v. Parker Fire District. This is important to property owners because litigation against government entities is often necessary to vindicate property rights, and the notice-of-claim statute can be a dangerous sword for the government to defeat solid claims on what amounts to a technicality.
  • Division Two of the Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion of great relevance to other professionals intimately entwined with legal-land-use issues: real estate appraisers. In Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. Nowak, the court held that appraisers owe no duty of care to the seller of property in appraising the property for lending purposes. This, I am sure, is a huge relief to appraisers who are between the Scylla of heavier government regulations and the Charybdis of impatient buyers and sellers.

In legislative news, HB2477 is making its way through the Arizona legislature, which would bring relief to property owners whose HOAs are charging them document fees for transferring their properties into the ownership of corporate entities for tax purposes. That would certainly help this person. Also, a minor amendment contained in HB2091 will slightly strengthen Proposition 207, known as the Private Property Rights Protection Act.

Arizona Daily Star's Road Runner Blog Reminds Citizens to Abide by Notice of Claim Statute

I am a huge fan of the Arizon Daily Star's road construction and project blog, the Road Runner. This edition contains a subtle reminder that injured people who have potential claims against most Arizona government agencies are required to file a notice of claim before bringing a lawsuit. 

In Arizona, an injured claimant must file a notice of claim "within one hundred eighty days after the cause of action accrues." 

180 days does not seem a long time to file a claim. It isn't. I believe the notice of claim statute is too burdensome and should be changed. However, it is (oddly) an improvement: Until 1963, Arizona followed the principal of sovereign immunity, which barred all lawsuits against the state.  

Arizona Government entities, and in particular counties, have learned over time just how powerful the notice of claim statute is. Any claim that is not filed correctly is completely "barred and no action may be maintained thereon."

My experience with the notice of claim statute has been that courts are very divided when applying the law. If you believe you have been injured by a government entity, do not delay in seeking help navigating the complicated notice of claim process.